Legal Opinion
Kissinger v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1958No. Civ. 22678PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
By their complaint in this action respondents sought a declaration of their rights under an ordinance passed by the Council of the City of Los Angeles which rezoned their property from zone R-3 (multiple dwellings) to zone R-l (single family residential). By its judgment the trial court decreed that the ordinance was invalid and void for, among others, the following reasons:
“3. Said ordinance deprives plaintiffs of their property without due process of law, in violation of Section 13 of Article One of the Constitution of the State of California.
“4. Said ordinance, if…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.