Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1937No. 4209PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is the third time that'we have had before us the suit of the Duke Power Company and its subsidiary, the Southern Public Utilities Company, to enjoin the construction by Greenwood County, S. C, of a power dam at Buzzard Roost Falls on the Saluda River and to enjoin Harold L. Ickes, the Federal Administrator of Public Works, from making a loan and grant of $2,852,000 to the county under the provisions of title 2 of the National Industrial Recovery Act, 48 Stat. 200, § 201 et seq., 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq., for the construction of the project. Upon the first appeal we…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Hammond-Knowlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Barnidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. State of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API