Legal Opinion
Barnidge v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 27, 1939No. 11282PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in eminent domain proceedings, which were brought under the Act of Congress of August 21, 1935, 16 U.S.C.A. § 461 et seq., known as the Historic Sites Act, The Secretary of the Interior, acting under the Historic Sites Act, determined that certain lands in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, possessed exceptional value as commemorating or illustrating the history of the United States. Thereupon, the President, by Executive Order of December 21, 1935, No. 7253, after reciting that by this Act Congress had declared a national policy to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Drakes Bay Land Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.