Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Branham
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Superior Court of Vanderburgh. County; John H. Foster, Judge. Action by Hal. H. Branham against the Pacific Mutual Fife Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
Appellee, who was plaintiff below, recovered judgment against appellant upon an accident policy issued to him by appellant. The policy is made a part of the complaint. The defendant answered in three paragraphs: First, a general denial. Second, that the plaintiff’s disability was not immediately consequent upon the happening of the accident, which was March 8, and the disability did not occur until March 24, and that between those dates appellee was not continuously and totally disabled, in consequence of the injury, to perform the character of labor mentioned in the policy. The third alleged…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- New York Central Insurance v. National Protection InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1854
- Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Pickel v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Rokes v. Amazon InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- North American Accident Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.