Legal Opinion

Karger v. Rio Grande Valley Citrus Exchange

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1944No. 11401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted in the District Court of Hidalgo County by Jessie Karger, a widow, of Dallas County, in her individual capacity and as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Arthur Karger, deceased, against Rio Grande Valley Citrus Exchange, a corporation, seeking to recover damages sustained by her when an ambulance in which she was riding collided with a truck driven by the agents of said corporation. The collision occurred September 26, 1941, at about 2 a. m., at the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Akard Street in the City of Dallas. The ambulance was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montrief & Montrief v. BraggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Walsh v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Perez v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hancock v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Perez v. Consolidated UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Boyd v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Smith v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Hancock v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API