Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Sammons

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1954No. 15491Published

1Opinion of the Court

267 S.W.2d 252 (1954)

HANCOCK

v.

SAMMONS et al.

No. 15491.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

March 19, 1954.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1954.

Nelson & Sherrod and Eugene Sherrod, Jr., Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Arch Dawson, Wichita Falls, for appellees.

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Appellees, Nova Rogers Sammons and husband, Mack Sammons, brought suit against F. S. J. Hancock, appellant, for the cancellation of three instruments which, upon their face, appear to be deeds but which the appellees alleged were in fact intended to be mortgages to secure payment of debt.

Judgment was entered in favor…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. SchrieberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Gowan v. ReimersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Ruffier v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Bradshaw v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API