Hancock v. Sammons
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Appellees, Nova Rogers Sammons and husband, Made Sammons, brought suit against F. S. J. Hancock, appellant, for the ■cancellation .of three instruments which, upon- their face, appear to be deeds but which the appellees alleged were in fact intended to be mortgages to secure payment of debt.
Judgment was entered in favor of the appellees, and it was held that the 'instruments were equitable mortgages securing -debts which had been fully paid, and that .appellant had been overpaid in the amount ■of $407.63. The instruments were canceled' .and judgment was rendered for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. SchrieberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Bradshaw v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Stampers v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Billingsley v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- U.S. Life Title Co. of Dallas v. AndreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Service Life Insurance Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.