Legal Opinion

Blake v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 25, 1996No. 14PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

We granted certiorari on our own motion and prior to consideration of this case by the Court of Special Appeals in order to decide whether personal injury settlement proceeds, acquired during marriage, constitute marital property. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. For the reasons explained below we grant the appellee’s motion, and, consequently, we do not reach the merits.

Clifton Avon Blake and Luvenilde Margott Blake were married on November 8, 1976. They separated in January 1987. In late 1990 Mr. Blake…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Pappas v. PappasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kim v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Lerma v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Maryland Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Bumpers v. COMMUNITY BANK OF N. VIRGINIASupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API