Legal Opinion

Whiting Finance Co. v. Hopkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1931No. Docket No. 7698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHEY, J., pro tem.

This action is predicated upon a stipulated statement of facts, from which the following pertinent to the issues involved in this action are taken:

Plaintiff, an investment company, was assessed in 1924, for city and county taxes in the city of Los Angeles and the county of Los Angeles in the sum of $463,573.91 as solvent credits. Against this amount a deduction in the sum of $142,175.15 on account of debts was allowed. Appellant claimed that it was entitled to a further deduction of $350,000 arising out of the following transactions: On February 25, 1924, the appellant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. The" Sunnyside"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Mitchell v. Board of Commissioners of Leavenworth County, KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Jones v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Whiting Finance Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HoehnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Richfield Oil Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Automobile Acceptance Corp. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API