Whiting Finance Co. v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHEY, J., pro tem.
This action is predicated upon a stipulated statement of facts, from which the following pertinent to the issues involved in this action are taken:
Plaintiff, an investment company, was assessed in 1924, for city and county taxes in the city of Los Angeles and the county of Los Angeles in the sum of $463,573.91 as solvent credits. Against this amount a deduction in the sum of $142,175.15 on account of debts was allowed. Appellant claimed that it was entitled to a further deduction of $350,000 arising out of the following transactions: On February 25, 1924, the appellant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- The" Sunnyside"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mitchell v. Board of Commissioners of Leavenworth County, KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jones v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Whiting Finance Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HoehnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Automobile Acceptance Corp. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932