Legal Opinion

Richfield Oil Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1950No. Civ. No. 17603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

On the first Monday of March, 1943, Rich-field Oil Company had accounts receivable from agencies of the "United States government of $4,025,109.72. At the same time Richfield had accounts payable to agencies of the United

*537States government of $2,158,145.40. These accounts and agencies were:

Accounts receivable:

United States Army .....................$ 2,164.71

United States Army Air Forces ........... 59,233.67

United States Army Engineers ........... 178,260.75

United States Navy ...................... 11,515.18

United States Navy Bureau of Supplies and

Accounts ............................…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Whiting Finance Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bessolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Whiting Finance Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Denny v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API