Legal Opinion

Quinn v. State Ex Rel. Leroy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1928No. 20717PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The paramount issue in this case is whether or not the proceedings in the case of Greorge D. Kildow, taxpayer, against the county commissioners, the county auditor, and the county treasurer, and the findings made and conclusion therein reached, amount to such an adjudication of the matters in issue in the instant case as to bind the parties in the present action.

The rule applicable to the situation is well stated in 15 Ruling Case Law, 1009, Section 483:

• “In the strict sense of the term parties to a judgment or decree, in the eye of the law, are those only who are named as such in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. People ex rel. Carey Construction Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Stromberg v. Bd. of Edn. of BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. James E. Duncan v. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Peck, Highlands Coal & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API