Legal Opinion

Zuber v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1989No. A8710-06401; CA A49999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendant insurer appeals from a judgment entered against it after a trial to the court on stipulated facts in this action on an automobile insurance contract. The issue is whether defendant offered uninsured motorist coverage to plaintiffs father by a method that complies with ORS 743.789(2). We affirm.

Defendant issued an automobile insurance policy to plaintiffs father in 1977. The policy was renewed every six months and was in full force on the date of loss, August 20, 1984. It provided for $25,000 in uninsured motorist coverage, which was the minimum amount required by statute. ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. White v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Blizzard v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Merkhofer v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Vonno v. Hertz CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tyler v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Beck v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Wood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API