Legal Opinion

Wood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1990No. 88-10-109; CA A60803PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff, one of defendant’s insureds, brought this action for a declaration that, because defendant did not repeatedly, at each renewal date, give notice of an option to obtain uninsured motorist/underinsured motorist coverage, the limits of her policy should be treated as $100,000. The proceeding was tried on the record as a submitted controversy, ORCP 66, and the trial court found in favor of defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff first purchased an insurance policy from defendant in 1965. In 1985, she was injured by a hit-and-run driver, resulting in damages of almost $55,000. At the time of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Blizzard v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Zuber v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pierce v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Pierce v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pierce v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Pierce v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API