Legal Opinion

Beck v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1992No. A8802-00982; CA A64213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs, the insureds, appeal from a judgment1 entered in favor of Hartford Fire Insurance Company (defendant) in this equitable action for reformation of an insurance policy issued to them by defendant. The issue is whether defendant had made an offer of uninsured motorist (UM) coverage that satisfied ORS 743.789(2). The trial court held that it had. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3); Haines Comm’l. Equip. Co. v. Butler, 268 Or 660, 664, 522 P2d 472 (1974), we affirm.

In 1984, defendant issued plaintiffs an automobile insurance policy with a liability limit of $100,000 and a UM limit of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blizzard v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Haines Commercial Equipment Co. v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Empire Building Supply, Inc. v. EKO Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Zuber v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Pierce v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Savage v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API