Legal Opinion
Grigg v. Bolton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1931No. 6491PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
Appellant, a resident of the city of Butte, Mont., was charged in an indictment, found by the grand jury for the district of Idaho, with having conspired with certain persons *159named and others declared to he unknown to the grand jurors to violate provisions of the Harrison Narcotic Act (section 2 [26 USCA § 696]). His removal was sought from the district of Montana. An order for such removal having been made by the United States Commissioner in Montana, he brought his petition for habeas corpus before the United States District Judge in that district, who reviewed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. GaultSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Reass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. LindenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Nigro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Sandroff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.