Legal Opinion

Mead Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 12, 2007No. 1-03-1160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE FITZGERALD SMITH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Mead Corporation, an Ohio corporation (Mead or plaintiff), appeals three orders of the circuit court concerning the classification and calculation of sales gain reported on its 1994 Illinois tax return, granting judgment in favor of defendants Illinois Department of Revenue (Department), Glen L. Bower, Director of the Illinois Department of Revenue, 1 and Judith Baar Topinka, Treasurer of the State of Illinois (collectively, defendants). Mead filed a combined unitary Illinois income tax return for the 1994 tax…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Corrigan v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. McKesson Water Products Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007
  4. MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API