Legal Opinion
MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 15, 2008No. 06-1413Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
128 S.Ct. 1498 (2008)
MEADWESTVACO CORP., successor in interest to Mead Corporation, Petitioner.
v.
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE et al.
No. 06-1413.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 16, 2008.
Decided April 15, 2008.
Beth S. Brinkmann, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Brian F. Barov, Chicago, IL, for Respondents.
Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Michael A. Scodro, Solicitor General, Jane Elinor Notz, Deputy Solicitor General, Brian F. Barova, Assistant Attorney General, Chicago, Illinois, for Respondents.
Beth S. Brinkmann, Brian R. Matsui, Nicole D. Devero, Morrison & Foerster…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Alito; Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.