MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
The Due Process and Commerce Clauses forbid the States to tax “‘extraterritorial values.’” Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U. S. 159,164 (1983); see also Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 504 U. S. 768, 777 (1992); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt, 445 U. S. 425, 441-442 (1980). A State may, however, tax an apportioned share of the value generated by the intrastate and extrastate activities of a multistate enterprise if those activities form part of a “‘unitary business.’” Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal., 528 U. S. 458, 460…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Telebright Corp. v. DirectorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Ellis v. City of MartinsvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Direct Marketing Association v. BrohlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.