Commonwealth v. Leatherbury
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
On May 6, 1977, appellant was found guilty after a non-jury trial of possessing an instrument of crime generally 1 and simple assault.2 Following denial of post-verdict motions and imposition of sentence, this timely appeal was filed. In addition to alleged insufficiency of the evidence, appellant asserts the Commonwealth’s failure to comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(a)(2),3 which mandates that a defendant be tried on or before the 180th day after a complaint’s filing. Because we find appellant’s Rule 1100 claim to be meritorious, we vacate the judgment of sentence and order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MumichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WeitkampSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BraithwaiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Karpe v. Borough of StroudsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. CanadySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.