Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Leatherbury

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1983No. 2140PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This direct appeal is before us on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for consideration of (1) appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of simple assault and possession of an instrument of crime and (2) appellant’s claim that he was prejudiced because the victim did not testify at his non-jury trial. Commonwealth v. Leatherbury, 499 Pa. 450, 451, 453 A.2d 957, 958 (1982). 1 Upon review of the record, we find appellant’s allegations of error to be without merit, and accordingly, we affirm the judgments of sentence imposing a total…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. SpeaksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API