Legal Opinion
In Re Aldridge
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 1995No. 93-BG-252PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
In this reciprocal discipline proceeding against respondent Donna C. Aldridge, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that this court impose the same sanction that the Court of Appeals of Maryland imposed, i.e., suspension from practice for three years. Bar Counsel supports the imposition of reciprocal discipline. The respondent has not taken exception. We impose the discipline proposed by the Board.
District of Columbia Bar R. XI, § 11(f) provides that when a member of the bar has been subjected to discipline in another jurisdiction, this court will impose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re FuchsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re Carr-KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997