Legal Opinion

Wood v. Apodaca

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 23, 2005No. C-05-1344 PVTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

TRUMBULL, United States Magistrate Judge.

On June 14, 2005, the parties appeared before Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull for hearing on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). The motion was filed by Defendants Randi Apodaca (“Apodaca”), Anita Spol (“Spol”), and VHM Sports, Inc. (“VHM”). 1 All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Based on the briefs and arguments presented,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Committee for Immigrant Rights v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Sebastian Brown Productions, LLC v. Muzooka, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Hubbs v. County of San Bernardino, CADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. BGC Inc. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. The Vineyard House, LLC v. Constellation Brands U.S. Operations, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API