Wood v. Apodaca
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
TRUMBULL, United States Magistrate Judge.
On June 14, 2005, the parties appeared before Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull for hearing on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). The motion was filed by Defendants Randi Apodaca (“Apodaca”), Anita Spol (“Spol”), and VHM Sports, Inc. (“VHM”). 1 All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Based on the briefs and arguments presented,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Committee for Immigrant Rights v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Sebastian Brown Productions, LLC v. Muzooka, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Hubbs v. County of San Bernardino, CADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- BGC Inc. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- The Vineyard House, LLC v. Constellation Brands U.S. Operations, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021