Legal Opinion
Hubbs v. County of San Bernardino, CA
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 7, 2008No. EDCV 06-0292-CBM(RC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) defendants’ Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement is denied; (3) defendants’ motion is granted under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss without prejudice Claims 1a, 1c. 1d, 2b and 3 under Heck v.…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gregory Village Partners, L.P. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Charles v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- (PC) Chester v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Davis v. RussellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Hill v. PrasadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.