Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1995No. Docket Nos. 96606, 97136, 98081, (Calendar Nos. 2-4)PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

Defendants in the three cases before us have been convicted of multiple controlled substance offenses and sentenced to serve consecutive prison terms. Defendants challenge the consecutive nature of their sentences, arguing that their crimes do not fit within the relevant statutory provision mandating consecutive sentences. Consideration of this issue requires us to decide the scope of offenses included in the term "another felony” as used in the controlled substances act provision mandating that a sentence imposed for *320violation of certain enumerated controlled drug offenses "shall be imposed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People ex rel. Twitchell v. BlodgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hiltz v. Phil's Quality MarketMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. RyanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. HillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API