Legal Opinion

State v. Motherwell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1990No. 55875-2PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

— Three religious counselors were convicted of violating former RCW 26.44.030(1), a statute requiring certain job holders to report incidents of suspected child abuse to governmental authorities. On appeal, all three counselors argue that requiring them to report information they learned in religious counseling sessions violates the establishment and free exercise clauses of the federal and state constitutions. Defendants Motherwell and Mensonides also contend that former RCW 26.44 ("reporting statute") is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. We reject the constitutional arguments and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API