Busch v. Fisher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Debt. Plaintiff, defendants Eisher, Crane, and Cole, and defendant Nester bring error. The facts are-stated in the opinion, and in the opinions in the cases therein referred to.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
In this cause, which is brought here upon writs of error, three parties appeal from the decision and judgment of the court below.
The controversy between the plaintiff and defendants has been, in different shapes, in this Court a number of times, in which the history of the causes of the litigation has been given to some extent. See Busch v. Nester, 62 Mich. 381; Fisher v. Busch, 64 Id. 180; Busch v. Nester, 70 Id. 525; Busch v. Fisher, 73 Id. 370. A brief •statement of the facts as to the origin of this suit is, however, considered necessary to give a clear understanding of the issues…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gates v. Rifle Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Busch v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Busch v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Fisher v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Busch v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quigley Furniture Co. v. RheaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Benedict v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897