Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Busch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is an action of replevin, brought by the plaintiffs as copartners under the firm name of "West Bay City Manufacturing Company against the defendants, to obtain possession of certain white pine saw-logs. The declaration was in the usual form in replevin. The defendants interposed a plea in abatement, and upon this plea issue was joined.

Objection is raised upon the argument that the plea does not possess the requisite allegations as to certainty required in pleas of this nature: No demurrer was interposed, and the objection comes too late after judgment.

The gist of the plea is that a prior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Busch v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Busch v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. SandersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Busch v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Busch v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Larsen v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Simon v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API