Busch v. Nester
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Replevin. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell, O. J.
In this case plaintiff, claiming to hold under certain tax sales, cut logs from,several parcels of land on Huron river, in Baraga county, in the fall and winter of 1884-85, and in the summer of 1885 these logs were put in the Huron river, and brought down to Marquette in rafts which also contained logs belonging to defendant. Nester, and by tugs employed for both. After reaching Marquette, Nester held on to all of the logs which this action was brought to replevy. A considerable number were afterwards turned over to plaintiff, leaving only such as were disputed! The parties are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mooers v. WaitNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Morgan v. VarickNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Keyser v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Busch v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Fisher v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Boardman v. BoozewinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Sherman v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.