Legal Opinion

Gates v. Rifle Boom Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff, in his lumbering operations, in 1882 cut over the line upon the adjoining land of Eust Bros. & Co., and thereby secured and marked as his own about

135.000 feet of logs belonging to the latter. These logs were mixed with the other logs of plaintiff, and banked on the west branch of the Riñe river. They were not run out the following spring, but remained in the rollway during the summer and fall of 1883. In that year Rust Bros. & Co. sent some scalers where the plaintiff’s logs were, who selected out, as best they could, logs of the same quality as those taken from the Rust lands…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winchester v. CraigMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Stephenson v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Tuttle v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Arpin v. BurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ayres v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Boaz v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Trustees of Dartmouth College v. International Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Quigley Furniture Co. v. RheaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API