Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant Johnson has appealed from an order of the Special Term of this court denying his application for leave to intervene as a defendant in this *844action individually or as amicus curios. Appellant’s answer discloses that his attitude in this litigation is partisan and, therefore, he should not be permitted to intervene as amicus curies. Appellant owns only seven per cent bonds in defendant power corporation. The trustee of that corporation is a defendant in the suit and there is no proof to indicate that the trustee is incompetent or unwilling to protect the interests of the bondholders.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re SpangenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Ladue v. Goodhead, New York County Courts1943
- Rochdale Village Inc. v. HarrisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
- People v. ReasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974