Legal Opinion
In re Spangenberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Marks, J.
By petition and order to show cause, the three trustees of an inter vivos trust, the McCrory Employees Pension Plan (Plan), have applied for a settlement of their accounts pursuant to article 79 of the Civil Practice Act now article 77 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
In accordance with the terms of the trust indenture, notice of ■the application was given solely to the McCrory Corporation, the only “ necessary party.” McCrory interposed an answer setting forth nine objections to the account and prayed for an order appointing a Referee to hear and report or hear and determine, as the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Matter of Evans v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Matter of Whitman. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Schieffelin v. GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of MayerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
- Reurs v. CarlsonNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of DrydenNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Dissolution of Karl Springer Woodworking, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1990