Legal Opinion

In re Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 7, 2013No. MDL No. 2466Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in one action move to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Illinois or, alternatively, in the Northern District of California, and request separation and remand of claims concerning unrelated insurance products and one insurer defendant.1 This litigation currently consists of six actions pending in six districts as listed on Schedule A. The actions involve allegedly abusive practices in the unilateral “forced” placement of hazard insurance by Wells Fargo2 and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Plavix Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re Mortgage Lender Force-Placed Insurance LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API