Legal Opinion

Coan v. Mole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Goan brought replevin for several animals, various farm products and other chattels, and under the judge’s rulings the jury found for defendant.

*455.It appears that Mole for a long series of years prior to the fall of 1874 had occupied Goan’s farm, and part of the time under arrangements for carrying it on upon shares; that whilst he was still occupying, and in that fall, it was verbally agreed between the parties that Mole should have the place three years more on shares. Coan furnished certain stock, and whatever stock was provided was to be fed on the common produce. The parties were to share…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huntington v. ParkhurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barrett v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Judd v. FairsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API