Legal Opinion

Sherlin v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Conceding, but not deciding, that there is evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, all the evidence leads to the conclusion that tbe intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law under the well settled decisions of this Court. In such case the doctrine of last clear chance does not apply. Redmon v. R. R., 195 N. C., 764, 143 S. E., 829; Rives v. R. R., 203 N. C., 227, 165 S. E., 709; Rimmer v. R. R., 208 N. C., 198, 179 S. E., 753; Stover v. R. R., 208 N. C., 495, 181 S. E., 345; Reep v. R. R., 210 N. C., 285, 186 S. E., 318; Lemings v. R. R., 211 N. C., 499,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. City of Radford v. CalhounSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Rimmer v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Reep v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Rives v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Mercer v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API