Legal Opinion

Reep v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

This action was instituted to recover damages for tbe wrongful death of the plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been proximately caused by the negligence of the defendant.

Construing the evidence most favorably to the plaintiff, it tends to show that the intestate was sitting on the end of a crosstie of the railroad track of the defendant, with his head resting against the extended fingers of his right hand, when he was struck by the engine of a passenger train of the defendant.

The jury, in answer to the first and second issues, found that the plaintiff’s intestate was injured by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Rives v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Stover v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Mercer v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Arvin v. McClintockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Sherlin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API