Legal Opinion

Devinne Hallenbeck Co., Inc. v. Autoyre Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The defendant is a manufacturer of porcelain bathroom fixtures and had on hand twenty-four hundred and eighty cardboard display screens which pictured its fixtures, and were intended to be placed in the windows of retail stores which sold such fixtures, for advertising purposes. The defendant had discontinued the line of fixtures which were pictured on these screens, and entered into an agreement with the plaintiff, which is in the business of lithographing and printing display signs, by which the latter agreed to prepare a lithograph of a new line of fixtures manufactured by the defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Murray v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Rosenstein v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Filosi v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. DeMiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Mattechek v. PughOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. FrilandoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Duka v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API