Legal Opinion
Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 8, 1952PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This action was brought to recover for damage done to a large washing machine while it was being transported by a common carrier. In spite of the fact that the defendant assigned error in fifteen of a total of eighteen paragraphs of the finding of subordinate facts and in the refusal to find twenty-seven paragraphs of the draft finding, it is apparent that the finding as made is amply justified by the evidence and must stand. As we have frequently said, such a wholesale attack on a finding seldom has merit. In this case it was unjustified.
The material facts found are the following: The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Campbell v. RockefellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Southern New England Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Crest Plumbing & Heating Co. v. DiLoretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.