Legal Opinion
Filosi v. Crossman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The complaint sets forth: Prior to May 1st, 1924, the plaintiff was the owner of three bonds of $1000 par each, and five bonds of $500 each, having an aggregate par value of $5500, viz.:
Orange Court, Nos. 870, 871, 907, 923, $500 each
6%y2, $2000.
Orange Court, No. 758, $1000, 6%%, $1000.
M. Rich & Bros., No. 647, $1000, 6%%, $1000.
Argonne Apartments No. 893, $1000, 6%%, $1000.
2480 Broadway, No. 1780, $500, 6%%, $500.
Shortly after this date Henderson obtained these bonds from the plaintiff by means of fraudulent representations. Thereupon Henderson or someone acting as his partner or in his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hotchkiss v. National BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Hassam v. J. E. Safford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- McLaughlin v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Devinne Hallenbeck Co., Inc. v. Autoyre Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Elbar Realty, Inc. v. City Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. RoccoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Garris v. CalechmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- State v. FrilandoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.