Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. Curnutt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1992No. 87 CV 0061-33; CA A67772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This is an action for usurpation of office. ORS 30.510. Plaintiffs, the directors of Mountain View Hospital District (MVHD), sought a declaration that Jefferson County Emergency Services District (JCESD) was invalidly formed, a declaration that defendants, directors of JCESD, were illegally holding office and an injunction prohibiting defendants from acting as directors of JCESD. The trial court concluded that JCESD and MVHD could exist simultaneously and, therefore, held that defendants were not unlawfully holding office. Plaintiffs appeal, and we reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landis v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. v. ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. CTY. COURT FOR WASHINGTON CTY.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. CurnuttOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mabon v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. CurnuttOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API