Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Meyer v. CTY. COURT FOR WASHINGTON CTY.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, C. J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought by the relators against the County Court of the State of Oregon for Washington County and the individual officers comprising the court.
This action arises from the following facts: In November, 1954, a zoning district known as East Washington County Zoning District was attempted to be created in Washington County under and by virtue of Oregon Laws 1947, ch 558, codified as ONS 215.210 to 215.450 inclusive. Section 3, ONS 215.260 of this Act, which provided that only freeholders could vote in the formation of a zoning district, was later…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Rathfon v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irr. DistOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Mackenzie v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Priest v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landis v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Kirsch v. CurnuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. CurnuttOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. CurnuttOregon Supreme Court · 1993