Legal Opinion

Mabon v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 2005No. 0212-12568; A121483PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that dismissed an action that challenged the authority of defendant to hold the office of Multnomah County Circuit Judge. He based his challenge on the contention that defendant had failed to subscribe to the correct oath of office and therefore was not qualified to hold the office. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed his action under ORS 30.510, which, among other things, provides a mechanism for challenging a person’s right to public office. The thrust of plaintiffs argument is that defendant did not subscribe and file, word-for-word and comma-for-comma, the oath of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Mabon v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API