Legal Opinion

Smith v. Elliard

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1981No. Docket 48565, 48570PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, J.

In this case we are required to interpret Michigan’s borrowing statute, MCL 600.5861; MSA 27A.5861, which, as amended, reads:

"An action based upon a cause of action accruing without this state shall not be commenced after the expiration of the statute of limitations of either this state or the place without this state where the cause of action accrued, except that where the cause of action accrued in favor of a resident of this state the statute of limitations of this state shall apply. This amendatory act shall be effective as to all actions hereinafter commenced and all actions heretofor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lamphere Schools v. Lamphere Federation of TeachersMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Parish v. B F Goodrich Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Heckathorn v. HeckathornMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stover v. RETIREMENT BD. OF CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES FIREMENMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beauregard-Bezou v. PierceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Cliffs Forest Products Co. v. Al Disdero Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bergman v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. DeKind v. Gale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Carr v. Core IndustriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API