Legal Opinion

Beauregard-Bezou v. Pierce

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1992No. Docket 124884PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this negligence action, defendant appeals by leave granted from an order of the circuit court denying his motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

i

Defendant’s motion for summary disposition is based on the six-year statute of limitations for actions against architects, professional engineers, or contractors arising from improvements to real property, MCL 600.5839; MSA 27A.5839. Defendant, a residential building contractor, undertook to construct a home for plaintiff and her husband, Marion, in a written contract dated October 16, 1978. Plaintiff occupied the home on September 20, 1979,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Department of Licensing & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Fennell v. John J. Nesbitt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Wildfong v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Smith v. ElliardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Marrero v. McDonnell Douglas Capital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Witherspoon v. GuilfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Lela Tompkins v. Crown Corr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. West Detroit Building Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API