Legal Opinion
Carr v. Core Industries
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1986No. 14915PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff (appellant) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action based on strict liability because it was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was injured on September 5, 1981, when a tractor-loader that was manufactured and distributed by defendants collapsed. Appellant brought an action alleging breach of warranties, strict liability, “violation of statutes and standards” (negligence per se), and res ipsa loquitur. 1 The sheriff of Minnehaha County received appellant’s summons and complaint either on September 6 or September 7, 1984. 2 The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Daniel v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- George W. Fassbinder v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Kern v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.