Legal Opinion

United States v. Real Property: 835 Seventh Street Rensselaer

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided April 26, 1993No. 91-CV-999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

Presently before the court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Fed. R.Civ.P. 56) in the instant real property forfeiture action brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, § 511(a)(7), 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7). In opposition, claimant Richard Habiniak argues that the action is barred by both the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause. Despite suggestions by the court, the claimant has failed to raise these defenses in the form of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Real Property Located at 6625 Zumirez DriveDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
  2. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. United States v. Real Property: 835 Seventh Street RensselaerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
  4. One 1995 Toyota Pick-Up Truck v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 32 Medley LaneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API