Legal Opinion
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 32 Medley Lane
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 31, 2005No. 3:01CV2290MRKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
This is a civil forfeiture action brought by the United States against the home of Harold E. von Hofe and Kathleen M. von Hofe (collectively, “Claimants”) under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”), Pub.L. No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (2000), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 983. Following a jury verdict for the Government finding that the von Hofes’ home— located at 32 Medley Lane, in Branford, Connecticut (the “Property”) — was subject to forfeiture and that Claimant Kathleen von Hofe was not an “innocent owner,” Claimants petitioned…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Von Hofe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds Lane, WaterfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- United States v. Six Negotiable Checks in Various Denominations Totaling One Hundred Ninety One Thousand Six Hundred Seventy One Dollars & Sixty Nine CentsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds LaneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Commonwealth v. 1997 ChevroletCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014