Legal Opinion

Naas v. Peters

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1944No. 27998. Judgment and decree reversedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fulton

This suit arises out of an action in the superior court of Cook county to foreclose a mortgage in which Rose B. Peters and Lester B. Peters were the principal defendants. A deficiency decree in the amount of $3834.45 was entered against both of said defendants, but an appeal was taken to the Appellate Court by Rose B. Peters, only. The Appellate Court affirmed the deficiency decree, (321 Ill. App. 212,) leave to appeal was granted by this court, and the appellant now seeks to reverse that judgment and the decree.

The facts are not in dispute and show that the plaintiff, Dorothy A. Naas, owned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conerty v. RichtsteigIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bride v. StormerIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Walsh v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Naas v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barkhausen v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Greenwald v. MarcusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Barkhausen v. CONT. ILL. NAT. BANK AND TRUST CO. OF CHICAGOIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. New York Life Insurance v. 1325 Astor Street Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Bank of Commerce v. Riverside TrailsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API