Legal Opinion

Bride v. Stormer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1938No. 24481. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Farthing

The appellants in this foreclosure suit sought to obtain a deficiency decree against the receiver of Henry Denhart & Company, a defunct State bank. The circuit court of Lee county, by its foreclosure decree of November 19, 1936, dismissed the bill for want of equity, as to the receiver, and, on December 29, 1936, rendered a deficiency decree against Joseph W. Stormer, alone, the maker of the notes and trust deed. The Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decree and the cause is here by leave granted to appeal.

There is no dispute as to appellants’ right to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gage v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Drummer Creek Drainage District v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Furber v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McIlvaine v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Biagi v. O'CONNORIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of Alton v. COUNTY COURT OF ST. CHARLES CTY., MISSOURIIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Naas v. PetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Phillips v. O'ConnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API