Legal Opinion

State v. Relyea

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 24, 2012No. 20100077-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Presiding Judge:

T1 The State of Utah appeals from an interlocutory order granting the defense's motion to suppress breath alcohol concentration results from an Intoxilyzer 8000 machine (Intoxilyzer). The State argues that the trial court erred in ruling that a foundational requirement for the admission of Intoxilyzer results, a fifteen-minute observation period, was not satisfied. In the alternative, the State contends that the trial court erred in excluding the test results because the fifteen-minute observation period required by State v. Vialpando, 2004 UT App 95, 89 P.3d…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Total Industrial Plant Services, Inc. v. Turner Industries Group, LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
  5. State v. RelyeaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API