Legal Opinion

Runft v. Saif Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1987No. WCB 83-03962; CA A34302; SC S32994PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether an employer whose working conditions were the major contributing cause of a claimant’s asbestosis may avoid responsibility for payment of compensation by showing that working conditions at the claimant’s later employment contributed to the claimant’s disability, where the claimant has made no claim against the later employer, and the first employer has not sought to join the later employer in the administrative proceeding. We hold that the first employer may not avoid responsibility in those circumstances.

Because there is evidence to support them, we take the facts as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API